Graduation for all English Language Learners Assignment

Graduation for all English Language Learners - Assignment Example 1 2 3 4 5 Scale # 3 (Personal Abilities / interest) Question # 6 Do I afford the cost / fee of learning English Language? 1 2 3 4 5 Question # 7 Do I have ability of learning English Language? 1 2 3 4 5 Question # 8 Do I have an interest in learning English Language? 1 2 3 4 5 Scale # 4 (benefits) Question # 9 After learning English Language, would I get good response from the market? 1 2 3 4 5 Question # 10 Would the English Language help / facilitate me to boost my professional career? 1 2 3 4 5 Introduction Peer Reviews; mean the evaluation of a work through diverse ways that ultimately gives confidence to the students / authors to look at their own writing as a work in progress. During the process of peer review, each of the students (peer reviewers) has an equal chance to criticize the work of their fellow student. The initial part of the document identified a construct and defined it using Peer Review articles / books on promoting English Language to all students till graduatio n. The developed construct contains basically four (4) types of questions which need to be answered to build up a trend for promoting English Language learning. ... The first (1st) scale contains two (2) items, whereas, each item has been rated five (5) points Likert scale. The two (2) questions on this scale have been developed to know whether the candidate has been facilitated to take admission in graduation of English Language. The second (2nd) scale contains three (3) questions and the answer of the each question would be rated five (5) points Likert scale. This scale has been developed to identify the efforts made by the English Language learning candidate for knowing the importance of the subject. Moreover, the questions identify the efforts of the instructors for attracting students to learn English Language. The third (3rd) scale contains three (3) items and each of the items would be rated five (5) points Likert scale. This scale identifies the personal interest as well as the capabilities of the English Language learning candidate to know whether the candidate wants to learn English Language. The forth (4th) scale contains four (4) ite ms; each item would be rated five (5) points Likert scale. The questions in the scale facilitate to recognize the future scope of the English Language learners; this scale would be utilized to motivate the candidates to learn English Language (Timberlake, 2009). Method of scaling These assessments use a summative scale to obtain a total assessment score to identify the level of the content. A five (5) step Likert scale has been utilized with the ratings include: ‘Strongly disagree’, ‘Disagree’, ‘Neither Agree or Disagree’, ‘Agree’ and ‘Strongly Agree’. The scoring for the above given ratings which have been utilized in the document include from one (1) to five (5),

The quality of risk management in the Civil Engineering Assignment

The quality of risk management in the Civil Engineering - Assignment Example The paper tells that to any engineer, a statement of â€Å"risk† in correlation with a hazard represents the combination of the probability that a hazard will occur and the resulting consequences of that hazard. The possible consequences could range from traumatic injury or death, the cost of rebuilding a structure, the loss of revenue from suspension of economic activity, In addition to environmental damage, and further dangers. To be specific, a hazard can be defined as a set of conditions with the potential to cause adverse or undesirable events. In any case, the safety issue has to be addressed either by the soundness and safety of the design, or by directed measures taken in advance to minimize dangers. Facility construction and civil engineering by necessity involves a wide range of risks. International projects — defined in this case as those where the owner and/or contractor originate from a country other than that of where the project is situated — usual ly require a wider range of issues than purely domestic efforts. There is no doubt that venturing beyond one’s typical business jurisdiction produces many unknowns. Factors concerning owner investment decisions involving international capital facilities can be highly complex and may differ in crucial ways from region to region and between various projects. Contractors are faced with similar challenges when they begin working outside of their country of residency. International projects differ from purely domestic operations in areas such as legal regulations, construction systems/equipment, available technology, and management strategies. The success of a particular venture, and in some cases the viability of the entire organization, can depend upon an understanding of the risks correlating with these projects. International projects that fail in these implicit challenges in terms of scale, budget, and scheduling can result in a variety of undesirable impacts with severe econ omic, social, and political consequences. There is little doubt that construction projects of many eventual purposes going through a process of systematic review for the purpose of risk assessment and managed decision-making will benefit over those that do not. Viewed collectively, construction in a global sense is an essential worldwide industry which by itself accounts for approximately US$3.4 trillion, which constitutes nearly 10% of gross domestic product globally. (Bon, 2000) This sum is distributed among local, regional, or national enterprises, yet an increasing percentage of industry players conduct operations on an international level (Bon 2001). Most recently, the United States has been the largest construction market. With estimates reaching over $800 billion USD—projects completed outside of the domestic market. Construction in a general sense has a history of even greater capital investment in the portfolios of American owners, as well as the work performed by Am erican contractors. The development and operations of multinational corporations serves as a major contributor to the creation of an international market for construction in a way not possible in previous centuries. (United Nations 2001). Most industry experts propose that international business opportunities will continue to attract American foreign investment, while the international construction market will draw U.S. contractors. American Owners are vigorous in searching out international opportunities for new markets or to streamline cost effectiveness in present manufacturing operations. The globalization of the international construction markets allows for considerable profit for contractors to expand into additional foreign markets (Hann and Diekmann 2002). With the expansion of profit potential comes in added need for safety. The effort to minimize safety hazards is not only an issue of public concern, but as the market expands construction hazards pose an increasing threat to the budgetary constraints of many firms. With greater investment also comes greater potential for losses if